Join, Renew, Contribute

Political Report

By Chris W. Cox
NRA-ILA Executive Director

Bon Voyage! NRA Intervention Keeps the Trail Open for Overseas Travelers with Firearms

For a tense few weeks this spring, gun owners traveling overseas appeared to face a road to nowhere, thanks to an obscure firearm “export” rule hidden behind misleading notices in a sea of federal regulations.

Ever vigilant, your National Rifle Association (NRA) sprang into action to ensure the way remained open, and we will continue the effort to ensure it stays that way.

In 1788, James Madison warned of laws “so voluminous that they cannot be read” and “so incoherent that they can­not be understood.” Those words rang true in March, when the federal bureaucracy suddenly decided to enforce a rule change that had been on the books but ignored since May 2012.

Any firearm or ammunition that crosses the U.S. border becomes subject to a complex web of regulations and regula­tory agencies. The primary law for outgoing rifles and handguns is the Arms Export Control Act, implemented by the Interna­tional Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). These fall under the jurisdiction of the State Department, which enforces ITAR’s registration and licensing requirements.

Nevertheless, an exemption has long applied for U.S. persons who temporar­ily export up to three firearms and 1,000 rounds of ammunition. This allows hunt­ers, sportsmen and industry employees to travel overseas with firearms for legal purposes, subject to the laws of the destination countries. Previously, travelers simply visited a U.S. Customs office before departure, where they would provide in­formation about their firearms on a form that was approved by a Customs official. Upon return to the United States, the traveler could use the form to verify prior stateside posses­sion of the firearms.

In March 2011, however, an obscure notice in the Federal Register (which publishes proposed rule changes) mentioned that the State Department intended to “clarify” the existing exemp­tion without changing its meaning by removing “certain extraneous language.” The next May, the change was formalized with another notice that stated, “[W]hile the text is revised, the meaning [of the exemption] is not changed.”

Those notices were false. The rule actually added a new layer of red tape for exempt travelers by requiring them to declare their “exports” and claim their ex­emptions through the Automated Export System (AES), a government da­tabase maintained by the Census Bureau. An informed reader of the Federal Register saw through the smokescreen and warned in a comment that AES was designed for commercial use and would not work for private individuals. That concern was dismissed by the State Department, which claimed in the final rule that it had “veri­fied” individuals could use the system.

For almost three years, nothing was done to implement the changes. That abruptly changed in March, when notic­es on the websites of CBP and Immigra­tion and Customs Enforcement stating that AES registration was being strictly enforced were picked up and circulated online by hunters and travelers.

The result was bureaucratic chaos.

As it turns out, the State Department’s claim that “individuals” have access to AES is true only for people who are “sole proprietors” of businesses with employer identification numbers (EINs) from the IRS. According to the IRS, EINs are issued for business purposes, and applicants have to state a business reason for obtaining one. The Census Bureau, how­ever, insists “an EIN can be obtained for government reporting purposes when a person does not own a business.” How should travelers resolve these contradic­tions? Very carefully, as providing false infor­mation to IRS or AES, as well as failing to comply with ITAR regulations, all carry potentially ruinous penalties.

These are only the beginning of a would-be traveler’s difficulties. The AES was designed with corporate compliance officers in mind, not private individuals. Registrants must negotiate a 34-page user guide and a 30-question qualifica­tion test to use the system, and ob­scure codes and data entry formats are mandatory. No assurances are provided, moreover, that information provided about personally owned firearms will be purged or kept confidential.

Fortunately, NRA quickly exposed the Catch-22 facing travelers, and further enforcement of the AES requirement has been suspended. While this is just the latest “executive action” to target firearm owners, you can be sure that others will follow on the long road to 2016 … and with your help, we’ll be ready for them.

NRA OFFICERS

James W. Porter II, PRESIDENT

Allan Cors, FIRST VICE PRESIDENT

Pete Brownell, SECOND VICE PRESIDENT

Wayne LaPierre, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT

Edward J. Land Jr., SECRETARY

Wilson H. Phillips Jr., TREASURER

Kyle Weaver, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, GENERAL OPERATIONS

Christopher W. Cox, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INSTITUTE FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION

For news about legislation and your NRA, visit: www.nraila.org, www.nranews.com and www.nra.org.



Archives


27 May 2015
1 May 2015
1 Apr 2015
1 Mar 2015
1 Feb 2015
1 Jan 2015
1 Dec 2014
1 Nov 2014
1 Oct 2014
1 Sep 2014
1 Aug 2014
1 Jul 2014
1 Jun 2014
1 May 2014
1 Apr 2014
1 Mar 2014
1 Feb 2014
23 Jan 2014
1 Jan 2014
1 Dec 2013
1 Nov 2013
1 Oct 2013
1 Sep 2013
1 Aug 2013
1 Jul 2013
1 Jun 2013
20 May 2013
1 May 2013
1 Apr 2013
1 Mar 2013
1 Feb 2013
1 Jan 2013
1 Dec 2012
1 Nov 2012
1 Oct 2012
1 Sep 2012
1 Aug 2012
1 Jul 2012
1 Jun 2012
1 May 2012